About PeptideGuidelines
The reference we
wished existed
PeptideGuidelines is an independent educational resource for peptide research. Built because the information researchers actually need — accurate dosing ranges, honest evidence ratings, clear sourcing — wasn't in one place.
Why we exist
The peptide space has an information quality problem
Search any peptide online and you'll find dosing tables copied from site to site — no one checking whether the numbers trace back to real data, or a forum post from 2015. The same figures get repeated with more confidence each time they're republished, until the source is completely invisible.
Forums are anecdotal by design. Reddit threads age badly, get locked, and reflect whoever replied loudest — not what the evidence shows. Supplement company content has a built-in conflict of interest: it's written to move product. Academic literature is the most reliable source and the hardest to access — paywalled, statistical, and written for people with a biology background.
PeptideGuidelines traces every page to published clinical literature, peer-reviewed studies, and established pharmacological references. Where evidence is strong, we say so. Where it's preliminary or limited, we say that too. Transparency about evidence quality is more useful than false confidence — and a lot more honest than most of what's out there.
What we publish
Peptide pages
A growing library of documented single peptides. Each page covers mechanism of action, dosage ranges, evidence rating, side effects, and stacking notes — always in the same structure, so you know where to look before you arrive.
Stacks
Multi-peptide protocol documentation. Synergistic combinations drawn from published research and established protocols, with clear rationale for each pairing and honest coverage of the evidence behind the combination.
Blends
Pre-combined peptide formulas documented with the same rigor as single peptides — full ingredient breakdown, intended application, and evidence context for each component.
Guides
Standalone educational resources covering peptide fundamentals, reconstitution procedures, and syringe measurement. Written for researchers at every level, with enough depth to be useful past the first read.
What makes us different
Every claim is sourced
We don't publish dosage ranges, mechanism descriptions, or safety profiles without a cited source. If credible published evidence doesn't exist for a claim, the claim doesn't appear on the page.
We grade evidence quality
Not all published research is equally strong. We distinguish between findings backed by multiple randomized controlled trials and those from a single animal study — using language that reflects the actual weight of the evidence, not just that a study exists.
Consistent structure, every page
Every peptide page follows the same layout. You spend your time on the information, not on finding it. That predictability is a feature, not an accident.
Content is maintained, not abandoned
Peptide research moves quickly. New trial results, updated safety data, and emerging protocols can change dosing recommendations. We update pages as new evidence becomes available rather than publishing once and walking away.
No unsourced claims
We don't repeat forum anecdotes, social media testimonials, or vendor copy as fact. If something is widely discussed online but lacks published backing, we say so explicitly — even when that disagrees with what's popular. We're comfortable with that.
Who this is for
Built for people who want the evidence, not the pitch
PeptideGuidelines is for independent researchers, students studying peptide pharmacology, clinicians looking for quick reference material, and individuals who want to understand the evidence behind what they're reading elsewhere.
If you value accuracy over hype, want to see the source behind every claim, and prefer an honest assessment of limited evidence over confident-sounding statements with no backing — this site was built for you.
What we're not
A reference, not a service
Not a medical provider
No patient-provider relationship exists here. Nothing on this site is a substitute for qualified medical guidance.
Not a supplement store
We don't sell peptides, research materials, or anything else. No affiliate links, no sponsored content, no vendor arrangements.
Not a vendor directory
Where third-party references appear on this site, they are informational only — not endorsements of product quality, purity, or business practices.
Not a forum
No comment sections, no upvotes, no testimonials. Structured information from published sources only.
By the numbers
What PeptideGuidelines covers today
New protocols and content are added regularly based on emerging research and reader requests.
Get in touch
Questions, requests, and corrections
If you have a question, want to request documentation for a peptide we haven't covered, or found an error in our content — we want to hear from you.
- To request a new peptide, stack, or blend page, use the Contact page with the peptide name and any relevant source material
- To report an inaccuracy, a broken citation, or outdated information, let us know through the Contact page — we take corrections seriously and update content promptly
- For general questions about the site's methodology or editorial approach, the Why Us page covers our standards in detail
Disclaimer
The information on PeptideGuidelines is provided for educational and research purposes only. It is not intended to be, and does not constitute, medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the guidance of a qualified healthcare professional before starting, changing, or stopping any treatment or therapy. Peptides discussed on this site may be research chemicals not approved for human use by regulatory agencies. Compliance with all applicable laws and regulations is your responsibility.